When you are examining any document which is contrary to what YOU believe to be true, I will offer options for what classification you can putt the author of those document(s) into so you can go ahead and play through toward a Wausau Yde course or work out your salvation on a Milwaukee Christopher Snyder course.
Hole 1: Quadruple-minded Nonsense
Hole 2: Historic Fiction
Hole 3: Area Code 810 Challenge Intended to Evade Detroit 313
Hole 4: Fishy Jonah Tales
Hole 5: Sprecher's Hampton Avenue Subjective Reading Material
Hole 6: Objectionable Opinions
Hole 7: Post Trauma Human Output Subject to Err
Hole 8: Natural Science Reports and Theorems
Hole 9: Occasional Love, Superamerica Style
( The front 9 options are not narrow minded.)
Hole 10: Auxiliary Police Non-union Reports
Hole 11: Grain Of Sodium Light Displays
Hole 12: Biased College Dropout Opinions
Hole 13: Various Mysterious Writings Not Signed By God
Hole 14: Wounded Veteran's Topical Literary Ointments
Hole 15: Dewey Cherek Key Lemon Law Books
Hole 16: Samarium TURN Table of Disputable Contents
Hole 17: Ivan Dixon Street Non-Scripture Trash
Hole 18: Brian Wojtecki's Memorial Night Shift Fallible Addendums
Hole 0: Non-Chalk Literary Efforts of Temporarily Sane Non-Robots
Milwaukee Mt. Sinai lobby advice:
" If you are upset that people have had negative opinions about you, why not try harder to do good to those people in order to receive 'most improved human' honorable mention in the future time of serious judgment calls?'
People who operate an actual good business know that honest opinions can be very valuable in helping them improve the quality of their output. I have to admit that children who were not home-schooled are more likely to be able to handle bad reports about their conduct or efforts. No matter how many times I might request a Wisconsin law enforcement agency to change their past reports about me which often held opinions that were offensive or complete falsehoods, they probably won't and can risk being judged by whosoever it is they believe will judge their works while in the flesh.
What if some people think Buddha is non-fictional character? What if some people think Samarium is a fictional element?
If you don't believe my reports, putt them into hole 17. If you do believe most but not all of my reports, putt them into hole 13. If you know I have added some fiction into my literary blend to amuse myself and others like Edward Lear, putt my blogs into hole 5 closest to Fred Madsen's memo books.
Yde isn't Strasser and ' Hip PA Chrissy' might be Chris Nelson of Philadelphia by now. May Yehovah lead you past me and my frugal literary attempts to avoid suicide while under spiritual attack or while being ignored and despised by those whom I had loved the most in times past. Should a professional paid Christian missionary person complain about being ignored during the first 2 hour grandma/grandchild time in 10 years when that adult missionary has intentionally rejected numerous requests to be visit their dwelling for over 10 years? I can't answer every sociology question.
😔
No comments:
Post a Comment