I don't buy or sell tickets to Las Vegas boxing matches or to Peter Pan plays, but what I do every day matters to my Elohim (Word 430). Here is a question that I already know the answer to, but only a few others will even contemplate after trying to understand the difference between 'destroyed' or 'put to death':
Is Jaroslav Spacek a better human being to his own family than $ and Richard Hendrikson?
When Jaroslav Spacek became part of the Spacek family, he became a natural part of his family and there is nothing to suggest that he would ever want to destroy his family once he became a 'Spacek'. When $ became part of the Hendrikson family, she became an unnatural part of my family and there is plenty of evidence to suggest that $ intent is to cut herself off from my natural family while she stays attached to the Nazi-type Shane Hendrikson family. For those hirelings in religious 'youth groups' who organize paint ball games, let me place the following warnings to those who fear Elohim but don't fear me:
Exodus 21:15 'He that smiteth his father or his mother shall surely be put to death."
With the proddings of Mosinee area men who were baptized as an adult such as violent Shane David Hendrikson, protestant play boys such as Paul Peterson and adultery participants such as Kelly Oehler, my son Richard decided to smite me, his mother, in the back at a close range with a powerful paintball without my consent and I certainly did not expect him to 'target me' and then laugh at me. When horrible male leaders play violent games, consequences are serious. I am not Richard's judge, but I expect יהוה to keep the penalty for his own laws intact, which means I don't expect my son to be part of the 'first resurrection' that so many Christians claim they will be part of. I suppose keeping low expectations is better than hoping for a miracle. I contend that what we do after we are baptized as an adult is taken more seriously than what we have done before we took on the name of 'Jesus Christ' instead of the name of Antonio Holmes.
Exodus 22:2 'if a thief be found creaping up and be smitten that he die, there shall be no blood shed for him.' When I struck my employee who actually was a THIEF in the lengthy process of stealing property and company assets from from me with his accomplice Stuart Rottier, Shane David Hendrikson did not die but if he did, there would no 'sacrifice' that could atone for his sins since he did not live to repent me. Reading onto verse 7, it is clear that when a man is supposed to KEEP and protect money and a thief steals it, the THEIF is supposed to pay double. Is this only good advice for voluntary Israelites? If a person survives the counter-attack of HIS CRIMES, then sheds the proper blood to atone for his intentional sin, full restitution is still expected even if the intentional sinner tried to claim that 'Jesus Christ' shed his blood to cover his intentional sin but any Bible student knows that after the sacrifice, the laws of restitution still apply to anyone who wants to be affiliated with Elohim against Nazi behaviors or politicians' apostacy actions.
Exodus 22:9: This verse is the 'catch all' for those who rather go before a judge than admit their guilt and repay according to Exodus 22:3. "FOR ALL MANNER OF TRESPASS, whether livestock, clothing or things, whoever the judge condemns shall pay double unto his neighbor.' This is a perfect law that the USA legal system hates for some lukewarm reason.
Exodus 22:12: As a police officer on extended injury pay, I understand this to be the 'safekeeping rule' that includes petsitting, babysitting, custodial orders and coat checkers. If a person takes on property or a living asset for a neighbor and the property or living asset is stolen or runs away, the does not have to pay double. If the thief is found, the thief should have to pay double, a full portion to the original owner and a full portion to the person who was 'safekeeping' property and was trespassed against. I see no possibility other good application of this law, since paying the pet-sitter ' or justified child custodian nothing' is unjust.
Exodus 21;28: If a family pet or livestock attacks a human, it is proper to kill the animal before the human gets killed. I do not regret asking that a German Shepherd named 'Noodles' be killed after I saw him bite a veterinarian that was not mistreating Noodles. Exodus 22:2 covers guard dogs that 'smite' a thief, in which case the smiter (the guard dog) should live and the theif can die in his sins.
Exodus 23:1: This verse is clearly what can and should be used against 'Las Vegas' advertisers who falsely report that what happens in Las Vegas is going to be kept 'secret'.
Exodus 23:2: After already deciding to be an adversary of Carl Allen and Rodney Whitaker types, I was comforted by this instruction which states that Elohim's people shalt not follow a multitude to do evil. This also should warn people to stay out of gambling casinos, Mardi Gras events or nasty Detroit Lions, Dallas Cowboys and other NFL,NBA or sports gatherings where cheerleaders dress codes have gotten as bad or worse than 'All My Children'.
Exodus 24:10: It did take me over 56 years to realize that the Book of the Law was completed and complied by Moshe Ben Amram as was the stone tablet work that was done on Mt. Sinai. The Elohim of YSHRAL's foundation work is the tribe of Dan's blue lapis lazuli, not a a green EMERALD! 74 men of YShRAL saw Elohim, but not HVHY. Try the Hushim trail instead of the Kim Smith trail and see where natural family suffers destruction but doesn't get killed by HVHY's forces.
Don't bother thinking that 'Dream of the Forgotten Child' by David Lanz is anything other than thought-provoking sorrowful child's music. What every family that has an abortion victim in their family tree should read is Psalm 119, Vs: 145 to 152, for such would be the sorrows of an innocent angel who at vs. 150 knows the abortionist is about to attack yet still knows HVHY, God, is near and that HVHY's words are truth.
Jaroslav Spacek does not seem as though he intends to hurt his mother or destroy his father's name.
Was it the Angel mentioned in Exodus 23:20 who has done the 'cutting off' work and pruned off $ and her husband from the tree of life to prevent my good fruits from being consumed or destroyed by them? Was pruning my son's family the only way HVHY could prevent me from serving them like I had in the past, only to be despised and hated by them now? According to Exodus Chapter 23, I acted very appropriately when all images of $, the woman who my son admires instead of HVHY, were removed from my household after I broke down the images on paper. I do retain images of my son when he was a kind son to remind me that I was a mother that cared for him and never deserted him, even if I did not care for myself properly due to ignorance of HVHY's perfect laws.
It may seem harsh and somewhat destructive to me that HVHY followed through on his promise to make all thine enemies turn their backs unto me' over a time period of far more than 1 year Exodus 23:29 indicates that a one year process off forcing an enemy away from you is not good for the land you dwell in. 'Little by little, my LORD drove away my son and his anti-commandment family to protect me, and that is more painful to consider than to think positively about Jaroslav Spacek's family today, since Jaroslav never did smite me, lie to me or steal from me.
In my next blog, my time in Charlotte NC will be reconsidered and remembered. Tears do release toxins, and joy does not always come in the morning.
No comments:
Post a Comment