Alon Anava had an August 3rd, 2022 presentation about the topic of criticism and rebuke. I suggest you watch it if you can before reading this opinion and warning.
Suppose a commanding officer came into a police station filthy and out of proper attire? Would you resist his authority or follow him into war and trust his authority in his filthy condition? The testimony of Zechariah 3 indicates that Satan rejects filth and bodies of iniquity, but LORD Yehowah is able to correct, cleanse and provide change of raiment for even someone who had been as filthy and smudged with iniquity as Yoshua. If you don't believe the book of Zechariah, you won't believe this paragraph, but maybe you will believe the next paragraph.
The LORD who has been revealed as יהוה , rebuked Satan's mindset, not his proper willingness to resist a filthy leader smudged with iniquity. After Yoshua had been cleansed and put proper attire, there is no more record of continued resistance from Satan, and I believe יהוה the LORD of hosts, rebuked Satan and Yoshua in this chapter to deter fighting between Satan and Yoshua. If you are worshipping and trying to appease a 'satan' who doesn't resist the unclean and improperly attired sinners, your satan seems to be very different than the Satan that LORD יהוה was willing to rebuke for his own good according to Zechariah chapter 3.
Most who accuse others of worshipping Satan' should be accusing those anti- people of worshipping Lucifer. Lucifer does not resist unclean, improperly attired leaders so he embraces the Catholic pope who already expects his clients to openly reject Satan. Is it possible the entire book of Revelation was contrived or revised to confuse the readers rather than point them to who is able to cleanse, gird up and properly cover Yoshua, the high priest ? I would say it is not only possible but probable that that has occurred, and I was frightened into stupidity by the book of Revelation, not by the book of Zechariah which lifts up the name of יהוה , which the 'New Testament' does not.
This is astounding to me, but not unrealistic. It was Satan who was trusted to test Job's conditioning, not Lucifer. Barry Awe and his wife tried to classify as Satan as an evil raven that departed from Noah's ark, only because of the phrase ' to and fro'. Ravens fed Elijah the Tishbite 2 meals per day, so if Awe thinks the raven represents Satan then such a Satan is indeed capable of assisting the prophets on team. יהוה .
Some people think the 9th of Av has passed, but I suspect it starts at dusk tonight. I don't see evidence in the Tanakh of Satan being incapable of instruction and resistant to rebuke, but I do read that he resisted filthiness, improper attire and people of interest with iniquity. If you don't believe the report of Zechariah, that's your pro-Lucifer problem that has been fed by Catholic and their protestants associates of Sunday, anti-Moshe congregations.
If you don't think there is a difference between Satan and Lucifer, you also won't think there is a difference between Yehowah and Yoshua, and you will br incorrect pending your choice to be rebuked or stiff-necked and Luciferian as Nancy Pelosi and Joseph R. Biden.
Barry Awe and his wife are misleading and confusing more people than Sam Fink writing about the Declaration of Independence. A raven is designed as it is to devour corpses and it differed substantially from a serpent.
I don't worship Satan; I do trust יהוה to rebuke and correct me as needed so that I am prepared to resist evil and increase my aptitude and skills for the battles of life on earth ahead. If you didn't watch Alon Anava's presentation about 'criticizing' prior to reading this little book, you once again did not properly prepare yourself as recommended.
I'm not the person who told my mother that she only had 5 minutes to speak with me in public, for that would have publicly shamed my mother.
Publicly shaming your mother intentionally is iniquity.
🍓🍓
I'll expound with 4 practical examples in a post labeled 'Valley Scenario" soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment