Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Local Police Should Be Able To Arrest Liars in Civil Court

There is a huge problem that has permeated the United States courtrooms as easily as Robin Cook and Robin Masters fill up shelves with there stupid fiction. Since lying to anyone intentionally is a sin as as harmful to a community as a drunk driver, coming up with a swift form of defense against liars isn't simple, but I believe it is possible. Lies outside of a courtroom should and can be handled by the families or parties involved either by spiritual counseling, correcting the liar if possible (what was perceived as a lie might have been an unintentional error after receiving incorrect information from another source, which is why according to standards for saints a person is supposed to inform the person that offended them of their error in hopes that the offender repents) or just ignoring the liar and proving him or her wrong over time, but lying in a courtroom after swearing to tell the truth has to be considered far more serious than a difference of opinion.

In family courts and civil courts, there currently is little to no deterrent to lie to the judges or to provide false information since civil court is usually all about money games. However, lying under oath should be grounds for immediate arrest. If in any county courtroom with deputies assigned, as soon as any lie can be proven during testimony, the local police department should be able to arrest the person testifying and declare judgment in favor of the truthful remaining party as well as assessing a financial penalty payable to the person who's reputation was assaulted by the guilty liar in court. Additionally, if false information was intentionally provided to the court commissioners or judges, again the local police should be able to arrest the person who intentionally tried to deceive their neighbor, their family members or their children ESPECIALLY during a divorce.  In such an instance, Stuart Rottier could have been and should have been thrown into jail for claiming that my Wisconsin S-Corp business was of 'nominal value' when I could prove and real records proved that it was worth a considerable amount in real assets.  Shane Hendrikson should have been arrested for telling the sheriff's department employees that y company no longer existed, and I could and still can easily prove that it did exist well beyond the date of his false testimony. What happens within the confines of a city and state jurisdictions includes what happens in the courthouses built there, and lying in family court eventually leads to even bigger problems for police and neighborhoods long after after the divorce or custody hearings have been handled without due diligence and without a standard of integrity within the gang-like structures of 'civil' attorneys.

People keep lying in civil court because no one thinks they can be arrested, but truly people who lie in family court should be found guilty of obstructing justice. I can recall Donald Jackson, former MIlwaukee fire department assistant chief, falsely claiming that I had abandoned my son in a family court, and he literally is guilty of lying in Wisconsin's Marathon County family court as far back as 1996.  Donald Jackson should be not only be ashamed of himself for lying but is possibly mentally ill if he cannot testify to the fact that it was his son, 'Todd Reynaud Jackson' formerly of 4001 West hemlock Street in Milwaukee, that abandoned my son, not me. Such lies won't be forgotten by people like me who were falsely accused.

Lack of conscience causes people to continue on as though they had not committed a serious crime against their neighbor anytime they lie in a courtroom. Sin will be dealt with eventually by some sort of disciplne if you truly are one of the elect and chosen people of the Most High God and you are being prepared  for a final judgment day.

Today as i sat in a public library, I heard a young man complaining that he hasn't been baptized and later he started making  racial jokes and jokes about homeless people. After he left,  some of his friends said he didn't have a mother because he chose to live with his father, but everyone has to have a mother even if she is deceased or has been released or forced out of the family. Losing one or even both parents is not an excuse to become a hard-hearted arrogant and spoiled child.  I rebuked the young man and warned him that if he ends up being homeless, it might cure his depraved perspective and he will no longer be laughing at the homeless.

No comments:

Post a Comment