Three areas of interest and intrique occur after a certain prophet was tempted in the wilderness by a angel named 'Satan'. Eventually, three other scenarios arise, and if yuo do not know the difference between a traitor and a betrayer you will be in more trouble than Judas Iscariot ever was in or will be in.
A) Today, Terry LaFrance insisted that Satan never occupied the person of 'Peter' the apostle. If LaFrance is correct, then Satan is Yeshua's back-up angel when non-angelic beings try to go against the will of Yehovah. If Satan actually got behind Yeshua in some sort of formation and did not stab Yeshua in the back with a #3979 dagger, it seems that Satan understands authority better than Peter did, at least at that point in history. Satan and Yeshua versus Peter became a genuine 2 on 1 situtation in earthly power plays IF LaFrance's assumption is correct.
B) When Satan's spirit entered Judas Iscariot, Judas became very obedient to the command of Yeshua to IDENTIFY him to those plotting to kill him. Judas Iscariot's natural spirit might have disobeyed Yeshua, especially if indeed he was a faithful servant who wanted to stay at the meal. I pointed out to LaFrance that the Messiah of Israel would never instruct a person to go out and sin, so Judas Iscariot's actions could not have been 'sin', but a necessary action to prove the wicked intentions of Rome and the irrupted church. If Satan could 'enter' Judas Iscariot, he also could have 'entered Peter, as in 'A'.
C) When the Benjamite Paul turned certain followers 'over to Satan' so they learn not to blaspheme, could it be that Satan was either allowed to offend the blasphemers OR to correct the blasphemers by revealing the truth to them? I don't have a concrete answer for paul's turnovers.
D) It was not easy listening to the 'Continuing CHurch of God' video services. When I arrived at my mission site, the internet was not working; I mentioned Elijah and the southern tribes and the internet started to work properly. LaFrance denied the possibility that my presence made a difference, so I will not feel guilty if I can shed some light into the dark world of the Jehovah's Witnesses, who seem to be a bit more appreciative of my presence, even if I am not a member of their non-secret society. i was saddened to hear LaFrance say that he did not believe that Catholics or Jehovah Witnesses would be getting a prophets sent unto them, but I suspect they will get warnings or flickers of true Light sent their way so that a few might escape relgious mytholgy and front slide to a better foundation of one of the 12 tribes if Israel.
E) LaFrance seemed to have a good grasp of the feast of Unleavened Bread and is not afraid to hear differing opinions, so he is not as bad as the typical hireling or Joel Breitzman who have no interest in being spared since they openly reject the commandments. It is better to misinterpret a commandment from God than to intentionally disobey, intentionally ignore or intentionally try to eliminate commandments.
F) When going to gatherings of non-atheists struggling with the Truth, how they respond to peaceful visitors and to insiders who bring in accurate 'outside' information does matter, especially if you keep the Rahab incident in mind. LaFrance insisted he would be judging angels at some point, but I highly doubt that he will be put into a 'judgment seat' position, especially if he insists he part of the tribe of Reuben. He said we also might be entertaining angels 'unaware' of their presence, and that is a point we agreed on as we departed in peace today.
G) I highly recommend the chicken or beef tamales with mole sauce at 'LaFonda's Mexican restaurant for a late oneg. LaFonda's is a better option than Catholic church wafers on a Saturday, especially if there is no venison chili offered in th basement of the Catholic church after the 'blah' cracker is handed over to you.
H) LaFrance, like many other humans I know, seems to study 'Star Trek' and 'Star Wars' type of fiction a bit too much, especially when he could be studying a bit more of the pure Hebrew language. Overall, I guess I avoided doing what 'my pleasure' would have been today in order to avoid forsaking the assembling of myself with some other anti-Nazi group. This is one evening I might have liked to go the Joe Louis Arena to study Don Granato, but maybe someday a righteous and fit man will want to study what I do in real mental, physical and spiritual battle situations
I'm going to avoid a 'Minneapolis' point today for the sake of 'Tav Resh Shin Yod Shin' footings and the Shannon to Lenox to Preston English vessel sequence.
No comments:
Post a Comment